What a “bonus bet” is really worth in New Zealand in 2026

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Bonuses in New Zealand betting come with a constraint no offshore welcome package carries: since 28 June 2025, only TAB NZ and its sister brand Betcha may lawfully take an online sports or racing bet from a person in New Zealand. Section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020 made the monopoly watertight, and the Department of Internal Affairs told unlicensed providers to withdraw from the market with immediate effect. Everything on this page sits inside that one fact. The bonus catalogue on offer here is small, the terms behind it are TAB NZ’s own, and the price of a “free” bet is the same arithmetic the rest of the world pays, even when only one brand is doing the paying.

The page is current as of 30 October 2026 against TAB NZ and Betcha’s own published terms, the Racing Industry Act 2020 as amended, and the Department of Internal Affairs’ public statements on section 74AAA.

The law that decides which bonus you can claim

The Racing Industry Act 2020 set the framework. The Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025 inserted section 74AAA, in force from 28 June 2025, which says no person other than TAB NZ may offer racing betting, sports betting or other racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person is resident or incorporated. The Department of Internal Affairs, the gambling regulator under the Gambling Act 2003, told providers serving New Zealand to withdraw with immediate effect. There is no licence register for bookmakers because there is only one lawful provider to register.

Two details follow from that monopoly and shape every offer on this page. First, TAB NZ runs “bonus bets” promotions because no New Zealand rule on bonus size or wagering terms was found, and every figure on a TAB NZ promotion is set by TAB NZ’s own terms, not by statute. Second, the other bookmakers a New Zealand punter meets online — 22Bet, Roobet, Rabona, Thunderpick, Rooster.bet, BetWinner, Tonybet, Megapari, SpinBetter, Boomerang Bet, Ivibet, Spinbara, LunuBet, LegendPlay, BillyBets, Golden Panda, Spinbara, Telbet, and the rest — are serving New Zealand unlawfully under section 74AAA if they accept a New Zealand–resident customer, and they do not answer to the Gambling Commission or the Advertising Standards Authority in any way a New Zealand complaint can reach.

The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 sits beside the betting law and is often mistaken for it. That Act licenses online casino gambling only; it does not extend TAB NZ’s monopoly, and the $100 deposit / 200% inducement cap it introduces applies to licensed online casinos, not to betting. A punter who confuses the two ends up reading a casino rule into a betting question. From 1 August 2026 greyhound racing closes in stages and offshore operators may not take bets on greyhound races either; this is the one sport-specific change the betting monopoly carries into the racing code.

The point for a punter comparing offers: a bonus published by an offshore brand is published for a market where the brand is breaking New Zealand law. The price of claiming it includes a New Zealand complaints route that does not exist and a harm-minimisation framework the brand does not run. The arithmetic below works for any bonus anywhere; the choice that arithmetic describes is between TAB NZ and Betcha on one side, and an unlawful offer on the other.

Safer gambling tools and the help that actually reaches you

TAB NZ and Betcha are run by the same operator and an exclusion in one runs across both. Inside the TAB and Betcha apps the safer-gambling tools are the same three: deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion. Deposit limits are set by the punter, by day or by week, and they are the single most useful of the three for a person who has decided what they can lose. Time-outs are short breaks. Self-exclusion is the heaviest, and a self-excluded account cannot be reopened for the period chosen. A self-exclusion through TAB NZ extends to Betcha; a self-exclusion through Betcha extends to TAB.

The free 24/7 Gambling Helpline 0800 654 655 (text 8006) is listed in both apps and is the help line a New Zealand punter can actually call. Safer Gambling Aotearoa is the public programme. TAB NZ also pays a Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74%, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028, which funds treatment and prevention; it is one of the few direct costs of the monopoly a reader can see in dollars. The levy is on TAB NZ’s side of the bet. The punter’s side has no national online-betting exclusion register, because the register the 2026 casino law will require is for online casinos only — another reason the betting law and the casino law are not the same instrument.

The Offshore bookmakers a New Zealand punter meets online carry no equivalent. They list a helpline, sometimes a Curacao address, and a self-exclusion button that, in the best case, removes the punter from that one brand and, in the worst case, removes nothing. There is no New Zealand complaints route to take a dispute to if a payout is refused, an account is closed, or a free-bet stake is not paid back as promised. That absence is the structural cost of an offshore offer, and the page below returns to it each time an offshore bookmaker appears in the comparison.

What a “bonus bet” actually is on TAB NZ

A “bonus bet” is a TAB NZ term for a free bet the punter receives as a promotion. The first thing to internalise is the one sentence every bonus bet on TAB NZ shares with every free bet on every bookmaker in every jurisdiction: the stake of a free or bonus bet is not paid back with the winnings. A $20 bonus bet placed at $3.00 returns $40 in cash, not $60. The $20 is the operator’s cost, and the operator has chosen to spend it as a credit on the bet, not as a refund.

The second thing is the size. The Mega Multi bonus, listed in the TAB NZ app, pays up to $50 in Bonus Cash when a multi of four or more legs falls short by a set number of legs; the term is “up to”, so the Bonus Cash scales with the number of legs and with how short of the mark the multi came. New TAB NZ customers can receive Bonus Cash that can be split across multiple bets — that is the part of the offer that says how the credit is moved around, not the part that says how much it is worth. The amount is set by the promotion in force on the day; the page does not list a working code and will not.

The third thing is the absence. New Zealand has no statutory cap on bonus size and no statutory rule on wagering requirements for betting; the casino law’s $100 / 200% ceiling does not reach betting. The only rule a TAB NZ bonus must satisfy is the Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code, which constrains who the ad can target and how it is worded, not what the bonus itself is. A punter who reads a TAB NZ bonus alongside an offshore welcome package is reading two documents governed by two different rulebooks, and the one that looks more generous may be the one the New Zealand rulebook does not apply to.

The arithmetic of a free bet on a two-way market

Take a TAB NZ promotion that credits the punter a $20 bonus bet. Pick a two-way market at illustrative decimal odds of 1.90 on each side — an even-money contest with a 5% margin, which is the bookmaker’s cut of every dollar bet. The bonus bet wins; the stake does not come back. The return is $20 × 1.90, which is $38 in cash, and the punter is $18 better off than before the bet. The bookmaker’s margin does not disappear on a free bet, it is already inside the 1.90 price, and the same $38 equates to $40 had the punter risked $20 of their own money at the same odds.

The free-bet value formula research uses is: for a free bet whose stake is not paid back, value equals the free-bet amount times (odds minus one) divided by odds, multiplied by the payout share of the market. For a $20 bonus bet at 1.90 odds, with a payout share of 1 ÷ (1/1.90 + 1/1.90), which is 0.95, the value of the bet is $20 × (1.90 − 1) ÷ 1.90 × 0.95, or about $8.55. The band is narrow because the example is set to be illustrative: a longer-odds bonus bet, say at 4.00, with the same $20 stake and the same 95% payout share, has a value of about $13.50, and a shorter-odds bonus bet at 1.50 has a value of about $6.33. The figure moves with the price, not with the headline size of the bonus.

The conditional that does most of the work is the payout share. A 95% payout share is a 5% margin, which is a thin margin for a major sport and a typical one for TAB NZ on its headline events. The same $20 bonus bet on a market with a 90% payout share — a 10% margin, which is closer to what an obscure league or a derivative market looks like — has a value of $8.10 at 1.90 odds, and $12.80 at 4.00. The bigger the margin, the smaller the value of the free bet at the same headline stake, and the more important it becomes to know the market the bonus is being placed on.

The honest reading of the offer is not “$20 free” but “a credit worth roughly $8 to $14, depending on the price it is taken at, on a market whose margin decides the answer”. The 1.90 example sits in the middle of that band; the realistic number for a TAB NZ promotion on a major sport is closer to $9 or $10 per $20 of bonus stake, which is a useful number to keep in the back of the mind when a promotion is advertised as “$100 in bonus bets” — that is closer to $45 to $70 of expected value than to $100, and the rest is the margin the bookmaker keeps.

The ten brands a New Zealand punter meets, and the cost of each

The table below lists TAB and Betcha first, as the only lawful online bookmakers in New Zealand since 28 June 2025, then eight offshore brands a New Zealand resident is most likely to see advertised. None of the offshore brands is licensed to offer such services to a person in New Zealand; the New Zealand status column says so for every one of them. The “what the operator’s own terms state” column carries the headline offer or, where the operator’s published terms are silent on the headline offer a New Zealand reader sees, a no-data marker.

A row that does not name a headline offer in the third column means the operator’s own published terms did not give a New Zealand reader a number to look at. The page does not invent one. What the table does say, in every row, is the licence position — because the licence position is the one piece of information the choice between brands actually turns on, and the only one a New Zealand reader can verify against a statute rather than a marketing page.

The first two rows are not rivals. TAB and Betcha are the two online brands of TAB NZ, run by Entain under a 25-year partnership signed in 2023. Entain runs the TAB business and shares gross profits 50/50 with TAB NZ, with at least $150m a year going to TAB NZ for the first five years, plus a one-off $100m payment to the racing sector. A punter who treats them as competitors and opens an account with each to “shop around” is opening two accounts with the same operator; the two are aimed at different product styles, not different price lists.

TAB in detail

TAB is the older of the two brands and the one with the deepest fixed-odds catalogue for New Zealand and Australian racing. The product on offer is the one TAB NZ has run for decades, refreshed with a mobile-first app and the Mega Multi feature that pays up to $50 in Bonus Cash on a multi of four or more legs that falls short by a set number of legs. New customers receive Bonus Cash on signup that can be split across multiple bets — a small credit, modest in size by international standards, set by TAB NZ’s own terms and unchanged by any New Zealand rule because no such rule exists.

The strengths are the parts of the catalogue that no offshore bookmaker can replicate. Same Race Multis and Same Game Multis are available, plus one-tap Popular Multis for a quick bet. The Place Extra option backs runners to finish up to the 10th place in selected races — a product specific to deep fields and not something an offshore bookmaker running on a global price feed will match. Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First4, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6 are all part of the standard racing menu.

The weaknesses are the parts of the catalogue the offshore world is built around. TAB NZ is not an exchange, so the back-and-lay model is absent. The in-play range is narrower than an offshore bookmaker’s because the Racing Industry Act does not clearly cover esports betting and the in-play catalogue is built around what the Act clearly covers. The promotions are smaller than an offshore welcome package because the operator is the only one in the market, and the only incentive to set is retention, not acquisition.

A TAB account is a fit for a punter whose racing book is the centre of the activity, whose multi is a Same Race Multi or a Same Game Multi rather than a cross-sport parlay, and who wants a New Zealand complaints route to take a dispute to. The arithmetic above applies in full: a $20 bonus bet on a 1.90 market is worth about $8.55, and the punter is paying 5% in margin for the privilege of using it.

Betcha in detail

Betcha is the newer of the two brands and is aimed at a younger, sports-first punter. The product on offer is built around the Multi Builder, which lets a punter build a multi, copy a trending multi from the feed, and track live legs as the games run. A new multi-grid builds Same Game Multis in a visual layout that is closer to what a global sportsbook is shipping than what a traditional TAB punter is used to. The Daily Toolbox is the promotion engine: odds boosts on selected events, plus insurance tools for bets that do not land — a refund in bonus form when a multi falls one leg short, a price boost on a chosen head-to-head.

The strengths are the social layer and the tool set. Bet Social is a section of the app where punters chat, follow tipsters and share bets or pools; the Playbook carries tips and match analysis. The Multi Builder is the part a punter who builds Same Game Multis is going to use, and the multi-grid is the part that lowers the friction of building one. The Daily Toolbox is the part that changes the catalogue day to day, with an odds boost and an insurance product most days.

The weaknesses are the racing book. Betcha is a sportsbook first, and the racing catalogue is the TAB catalogue, because the two brands run on the same engine. A punter whose racing book is the centre of the activity will use TAB for racing and Betcha for sports multis, and that is the use case the two brands are designed for. The 17+ App Store age rating is the same as TAB’s; the Safer Betting tools inside the app are the same three; the helpline listed is the same 0800 654 655.

The bet on Betcha is on the product, not the operator. A punter who might otherwise build a Same Game Multi on a global sportsbook can build one on Betcha with the same features and a New Zealand harm-minimisation framework behind it. The Daily Toolbox odds boosts are the daily price the punter pays attention to, and a boosted odds promotion is closer in value to the headline price than a deposit match, because the price is the offer, not a credit on the bet.

LegendPlay in detail

LegendPlay is a Curaçao-licensed brand, which gives it no right to accept New Zealand custom. The Anjouan Gaming Authority licence the brand also names gives the same answer from a different address. The promotions on the home page are a First Deposit Bonus, a Weekly Reload Bonus, a Sport Jackpot, a Virtual Sports Excitement promo and an Acca Boost. None of these are described here in more detail because the offer is not a New Zealand offer; a punter who claims any of them from inside New Zealand is the customer of an offshore brand in breach of section 74AAA.

The page names the brand because New Zealand punters see it in advertising. What it does not do is rate the bonus. The bonus is a number; the cost of claiming it is the absence of a New Zealand complaints route if the bonus is paid late, paid in a different currency, or not paid at all, and the absence of a New Zealand harm-minimisation framework the brand has to follow. The TAB NZ and Betcha offers above carry both; the LegendPlay offer carries neither.

The brand does not serve the New Zealand punter lawfully, the bonus is a marketing spend on a market the brand is not licensed for, and the better version of the same product is a TAB NZ or Betcha offer that pays in NZ dollars and answers to the Advertising Standards Authority. LegendPlay is not a viable option for a New Zealand punter.

22Bet in detail

22Bet is a Curaçao-licensed brand (8048/JAZ) under TechSolutions Group N.V. and is named here because the catalogue is the second-most commonly seen offshore catalogue in New Zealand advertising. The number of market types is the figure that gets quoted: 30+ market types per event, including 1X2, Double Chance, totals, both teams to score, correct score and HT-FT on football, plus tennis game, set and handicap markets. The number of market types is not the same as the margin on those market types, and a punter who is comparing catalogues by headline count is comparing the wrong number.

The Curaçao licence gives 22Bet no right to accept New Zealand custom. A New Zealand punter who opens an account with 22Bet is the customer of a brand that is breaking New Zealand law by serving them, and the New Zealand complaints route does not exist. The promotions the brand runs are not described here for the same reason LegendPlay’s are not described in detail: a bonus is a number, and the cost of the bonus is the regulatory framework it is paid inside.

The breadth of the catalogue is real and the price depth on a major football match is competitive with the global market, but the price is offered by a brand that is not licensed to offer it to a New Zealand punter, and the punter who takes the price is paying a price of their own in the form of a dispute path that runs to Curaçao. 22Bet offers no valid path for a New Zealand punter.

Telbet in detail

Telbet describes itself as a crypto casino and sportsbook and runs a sportsbook section with in-play betting and a “My Bets” page. The headline offer on the Russian-language site is 200% up to 1 BTC plus 50 free spins, with a 5 USDT free bet layered on top. The English site does not name a New Zealand–specific welcome, and the absence of a New Zealand version of the terms is the absence of a New Zealand offer.

The brand names no licence that applies in New Zealand. The crypto angle is the reason a New Zealand punter sees the brand advertised: crypto deposits are not blocked, and the brand is positioned for the crypto user. A crypto deposit is not a New Zealand–regulated deposit, and the absence of a New Zealand harm-minimisation framework means the safer-gambling tools in the brand’s own app are the only tools that apply, which is the same answer every offshore brand gives.

The crypto angle is real, the in-play catalogue is real, and the cost is the same one every offshore brand carries: a New Zealand complaints route that does not exist, a harm-minimisation framework the brand does not run, and a regulator in a jurisdiction that does not have the same consumer protection standards the Department of Internal Affairs applies. Telbet is not designed for a New Zealand punter.

Roobet in detail

Roobet is a brand of Raw Entertainment B.V., registered in Curaçao under registration number 157205 and licensed under Curaçao OGL/2024/687/0427. The brand is a crypto casino and sportsbook, and the headline is brand recognition rather than a published welcome offer a New Zealand reader can quote. The Curaçao licence is the only licence the brand names, and it gives no right to accept New Zealand custom.

The brand does not name a New Zealand–specific promotion in the published terms. The cost of an account is the same one every offshore brand carries, and the safer-gambling tools in the brand’s own app are the only ones that apply. A New Zealand punter who opens an account is the customer of a brand that is not licensed to serve them, and the regulator in Curaçao is the regulator a dispute is taken to.

The brand recognition is real, the crypto sportsbook is real, and the New Zealand reader is paying for both with a regulatory framework the brand does not run and a complaints route the regulator in Curaçao is the only address for. Roobet provides no lawful service to a New Zealand punter.

Rabona in detail

Rabona launched on 23 December 2019 as the sixth online sportsbook of the Soft2Bet group, which is a Curaçao-licensed group. The brand’s headline is its catalogue, not a single welcome offer, and the promotions it runs are reload and sports-specific promos that change with the season.

The Soft2Bet group is a real operator, and the catalogue is the same one the group’s other brands ship. The New Zealand reader is paying for the catalogue with the same structural cost every offshore brand carries. The price depth on a Champions League match is competitive with the global market; the regulatory framework the bet is placed inside is not the New Zealand one.

The catalogue is broad, the price depth is real, and the New Zealand reader is paying for both with a regulatory framework that does not include a New Zealand complaints route. Rabona is not a viable option for a New Zealand punter.

Rooster.bet in detail

Rooster.bet is operated by Novatrix SRL, a company incorporated in Costa Rica with registration number 3-102-893958, and is licensed under e-gaming licence No. 0000002 issued by the Tobique Gaming Commission. The Tobique Gaming Commission is not a regulator the Department of Internal Affairs recognises for the purposes of section 74AAA, and the licence gives no right to accept New Zealand custom. The brand’s published terms name the licence; the page names the licence for the same reason, because the licence is the only piece of information a New Zealand reader can verify against a statute.

The catalogue is a sportsbook and a casino on the same account. The safer-gambling tools in the brand’s own app are the only ones that apply, and the New Zealand complaints route does not exist. A New Zealand punter who opens an account is the customer of a brand that is not licensed to serve them.

Rooster.bet is not suitable for a New Zealand punter. The brand is a real operator, the licence is a real licence in a jurisdiction that does not extend that recognition to New Zealand, and the New Zealand reader is paying for the catalogue with the absence of a regulator they can write to.

Golden Panda in detail

Golden Panda is a brand that ships a sports section with a sportsbook, esports and virtual sports, plus casino, live casino, crash games, rewards, cashback, a VIP Club, Golden Goals and Prediction Markets. The breadth of the catalogue is the headline, and the brand names no licence that applies in New Zealand. A New Zealand punter who opens an account is the customer of a brand that is not licensed to serve them, and the regulatory framework the bet is placed inside is the one the brand’s own jurisdiction runs.

The “Prediction Markets” label is worth a moment. The brand positions some markets as prediction rather than betting, which is a marketing term for a market that takes a position on a real-world event and pays out if the position is correct. The Department of Internal Affairs does not recognise this distinction for the purposes of section 74AAA; if the market takes a stake and pays a return on a sports or racing outcome, it is a bet for the purposes of the Act. A New Zealand punter who is told a market is a prediction market is being told a marketing term, not a regulatory one.

Golden Panda is not suitable for a New Zealand punter. The breadth of the catalogue is real, the marketing is real, and the New Zealand reader is paying for both with a regulatory framework that treats the offer as a bet the brand is not licensed to take.

RTbet in detail

RTbet is a Curaçao-licensed brand, and the two terms a New Zealand reader will see in the published terms are the minimum bet of 0.5 in the customer’s account currency and the cap of 30 selections on a multi or system bet. The minimum is operator-level and the cap is a product limit, neither of which is a New Zealand–level rule. Both are quoted here because they are the two facts a New Zealand reader can verify against a published terms page.

The Curaçao licence gives no right to accept New Zealand custom, and the brand names no New Zealand–specific offer in the published terms.

A RTbet account is a fit for nobody in New Zealand. The minimum bet and the 30-selection cap are real product features; the regulatory framework the bet is placed inside is the one Curaçao runs, and the New Zealand reader is paying for the catalogue with a complaints route that does not run through the Department of Internal Affairs.

How to read the comparison above

The ten brands in the table split into two groups, and the split is the only thing the comparison is for. The first two — TAB and Betcha — are the two online brands of TAB NZ, the only provider lawfully offering racing and sports betting to people in New Zealand since 28 June 2025. The next eight are licensed in other jurisdictions, and none of those jurisdictions extends recognition to New Zealand for the purposes of section 74AAA. The bonus column on the right of the table is a comparison of two things that are not the same kind of thing. A TAB NZ bonus is paid inside a New Zealand harm-minimisation framework, with a complaints route to the Advertising Standards Authority and the Department of Internal Affairs, in NZ dollars, by an operator the Department of Internal Affairs has told to be the only one. A LegendPlay bonus, a 22Bet market catalogue, a Telbet crypto welcome — none of these are paid inside that framework, none of them have that complaints route, and none of them are paid in NZ dollars by an operator the Department of Internal Affairs recognises.

The price the New Zealand reader pays for the offshore offer is the price the table does not show. It is the regulatory gap, the dispute path that runs to Curaçao or Anjouan or the Tobique Gaming Commission, and the absence of a New Zealand harm-minimisation framework. That price is not a number the page can quote on a single line; it is the structure of the offer, and the structure is the same for every offshore brand in the table. The page returns to that structure in each operator write-up above, and the conclusion is the same: an offshore account is a fit for nobody in New Zealand, and the only question for a New Zealand punter comparing TAB and Betcha is which of the two product styles suits the betting they actually do.

Frequently asked questions

Are there New Zealand rules on the size or terms of a betting bonus?

No statutory cap on bonus size or wagering requirements for betting was found. The $100 / 200% inducement cap in the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 applies to licensed online casinos, not to betting. Every figure on a TAB NZ or Betcha promotion is set by the operator’s own terms, and the only New Zealand rule those terms must satisfy is the Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code, which constrains who the ad can target.

Why is the stake of a free or bonus bet not paid back with the winnings?

A free bet is a credit the operator gives the punter to place a bet, not a refund of the stake. The bookmaker’s margin is already inside the odds, and the stake is the operator’s cost of acquiring the customer. A $20 bonus bet at odds of 1.90 returns $38 in cash, not $60, and the $20 is the price the operator has set for the promotion. The same rule applies to a TAB NZ Bonus Cash credit.

Which bookmaker may lawfully take sports and racing bets in New Zealand?

TAB NZ, through its two online brands TAB and Betcha, under section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020 as amended in 2025 and in force from 28 June 2025. There is no licence register for bookmakers because there is only one lawful provider. The Department of Internal Affairs told unlicensed providers to withdraw from the New Zealand market with immediate effect. The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 does not extend this monopoly to online casinos; it is a separate regime.

How is the return on a bet worked out from the stake and the odds?

For a single bet, the return is the stake multiplied by the decimal odds. A $20 bet at odds of 1.90 returns $38 if it wins, and the net profit is the stake multiplied by (odds minus one), which is $18. For a combination bet, the odds of the legs multiply into one price. A three-leg multi with legs at 1.90, 1.90 and 1.90 has combined odds of 6.86, and a $10 stake returns $68.60 if all three legs win.

Which tools for controlling play do TAB and Betcha offer, and who can be called for help?

Both apps list deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion. A self-exclusion through one brand extends to the other because both are run by TAB NZ. The free 24/7 Gambling Helpline 0800 654 655 (text 8006) is listed in both apps, and Safer Gambling Aotearoa is the public programme. TAB NZ pays a Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74% to fund treatment and prevention. The offshore brands in the comparison carry no equivalent framework.

What does a player lose by betting with a bookmaker that has no New Zealand licence?

Three things, in order of how often they bite. First, there is no New Zealand complaints route — a dispute about a refused payout, a closed account or a bonus not paid as advertised runs to the regulator in the operator’s own jurisdiction, not to the Department of Internal Affairs. Second, there is no New Zealand harm-minimisation framework — the safer-gambling tools in the operator’s own app are the only ones that apply, and there is no cross-brand exclusion because the offshore brand is not part of the New Zealand system. Third, the operator is breaking New Zealand law under section 74AAA by serving the customer, and the Department of Internal Affairs has warned that overseas operators may be in jurisdictions with minimal consumer safeguards, may not return unspent credits and may not pay out large wins.

Prepared by the Kiwibettingsites editorial staff.